Movie Review: Casino Royale (Plus bonus Bond bashing!)

Dennis suggests Casino Royale (in Action).  Bond, Bond, Bond…let’s review, shall we:

Connery.  The only Bond, as far as most people are concerned, the then-unknown Scot had a twinkly comic thing to go along with an imposing physicality (meaning he looked like he could actually kick a little SPECTRE ass).  Never had much range, here or anywhere else, but gets by on seemingly effortless charisma.  Best film: From Russia With Love (beats out the more famous Goldfinger and Dr. No with a superior villain in Robert Shaw and some unexpected dramatic weight).  Worst: Diamonds Are Forever.

Lazenby. Poor Aussie bastard never stood a chance replacing Connery, but didn’t acquit himself all that well in any case; looks and acts weirdly like he was cloned from Connery DNA by the world’s 3rd-best scientist.  No match for the series’ best actress Diana Rigg, who blows him off the screen.  Best, worst and only film: On Her Majesty’s Secret Service (with a better Bond, this would be remembered as the best of the bunch; tight, exciting action, a tragic love story, Rigg.  Too bad about the stiff).

Moore. Lightweight TV star became Bond for an entire generation and presided over the series degeneration into a gimmicky, jokey bore.  Moore (and his stuntperson army) threw flabby, ineffective punches, tossed off smarmy, groanworthy one-liners and stiffly smooched some of the dullest actresses in the world.  The series, consequently, becomes unbelievably popular.  Best film: The Spy Who Loved Me (some good action, sexy Barbara Bach makes an engaging, competent Bond Girl, and, of course, Richard Kiel’s Jaws is a lot of fun).  Worst film: Jesus, pick one.  In a close race, I pick the abominable Moonraker.

Dalton: Eh.  Good actor. Very dull Bond.  Funny in the recent Hot FuzzBest film/Worst film: Can’t muster up the enthusiasm to say.

Brosnan:  Another TV star-turned-Bond, but what a difference talent makes.  He’s got the suave down, but with a touch of gravitas and sense of humor to back it up.  Not the most imposing physical specimen around (in fact, he looks a bit breakable), but game, and willing to get his hair mussed once in a while.  Sabotaged by increasingly awful scripts.  Best film: Goldeneye (taut, exciting, and fun).  Worst film:  all the rest, which blend together in a sea of terrible female leads (except Michelle Yeoh), Moore-quality one-liners, product placement, and flabby direction.

And now Craig:  this is more like it.  Taking it back to the beginning, Casino Royale shows Bond on his first “licensed to kill” mission, with him still rough around the edges, a little unsure of himself, and more realistically dangerous.  Genuinely physically-imposing, with more than a little of the thug about him, Craig’s lumpy-faced Bond has, obviously, kicked a lot of ass in his time, has a nice mix of cockiness and insecurity, and, as played by a real actor, actually creates, for the first time, something of a human being.  Few gadgets, no lame jokes, an opening chase sequence equal to Raiders of the Lost Ark’s, and an all-around revelation to a moribund franchise.  Proposed tagline:  Bond’s back…and this time he’s got talent.

Advertisements
Published in: on June 28, 2009 at 1:05 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , ,

The URI to TrackBack this entry is: https://videoportjones.wordpress.com/2009/06/28/movie-review-casino-royale-plus-bonus-bond-bashing/trackback/

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: